
These are the new Adidas Major League Soccer (MLS) football kits fot the 08/09 season . FC Dallas, CD Chivas USA, Red Bull New York, New England Revolution, Kansas City Wizards, Chicago Fire, Columbus Crew, D.C. United, Toronto FC, Los Angeles Galaxy, Real Salt Lake, San Jose Earthquakes, Houston Dynamo.
Major League Soccer has reached an agreement with Adidas on a 10-year contract worth an estimated $150 million in 2004. Adidas, the German-based sports apparel firm, is the official athletic sponsor and licensed product supplier to MLS.
The company has sponsored three MLS clubs -- D.C. United, Columbus and Kansas City -- since 1996 and added Dallas, Colorado, San Jose and the Los Angeles and Salt Lake City expansion teams in 2005. It got New England, New York/New Jersey, San Jose, Chicago and the other Los Angeles team (the Galaxy) in 2006.Adidas also provide the league with its official ball and are the only athletic brand with advertising rights for all MLS games. The deal also increases the likelihood of MLS teams playing exhibitions against prestigious Adidas-backed clubs, such as Bayern Munich, Ajax, Real Madrid, Liverpool and AC Milan.










MLS Adidas 08/09 football kits jersey collection


.jpg)

Comments
the only improvement is dc united
San Jose\'s kit looks like an away-day third-kit bodge job. Truly shocking...
adidas are goin downhill
And where are Houston\'s championship stars...
I agree with cronaldo7 about NY\'s sponsor logo, maybe next year.
Otherwise pretty good overall
IMO, A golden opportunity missed to make unique looking football kits that makes the MLS stand out..like in the 70\'s & 80\'s..
Chicago has worn an all-red kit with a white stripe across the front since the club was formed in 1998.
I think they actually modeled it on Stuttgart
when PUMA did the shirts they were the same as Stuttgart\'s
There was no MLS in the 70s/80s.
There is no new LA kit.
Houston has a championship star and the scudetto again.
KC and SJ\'s crests are either too big or too high on the shirt, I can\'t figure out which one.
Besides, the MLS is rubbish, the only 2 decent players are Angel and Beckham because they have played proper football
I bet Millwall can thump all the clubs in the MLS
Millwall till i die !!!!
New England should ask for their money back
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLS_Cup#MLS_Scudetto
As to the guy talking about MLS in the 70\'s/80\'s, ha! He must mean the NASL. Some NASL clubs had excellent uniforms (Tampa Bay Rowdies, Cosmos circa 1980, etc) and some had truly awful uniforms (Colorado Caribou, anyone? fringe?) so it is a very mixed bag.
...but I\'m still trying to figure out what the hell is so \"Real\" (Royal) about Salt Lake City. Makes about as much sense as forming a new team called \"United\". That word is supposed to represent a consolidation of former clubs.
If you want to give a nod to footballing tradition, \"FC\" works just fine (or how about \"Athletic,\" \"Sporting,\" or \"City\"?) without making a cartoonish mockery of things. What\'s next, \"San Diego Town\"??
Well, I guess we can at least be glad the fricking \"Wiz\" is dead.
I wonder how that worked with Chivas USA when they joines, seeing how the main team uses Reebok.