Club America 09/10 Nike Football shirts
Club America unveiled the new 09/10 Kits made by Nike, and are perhaps the only team to always have their away jersey in a similar style as the home shirt, only in the reverse colours.
Available Here
The new shirts featuring a V in the front: blue on the home/yellow on the away. Plus, like most Nike teams, the shirts feature advanced Dri-FIT® fabric, which will keep you drier, cooler and lighter by drawing sweat from the body to the fabric’s surface, while its three-dimensional construction gives more air space around the skin to reduce clinging.
.jpg)
Comments
Love the sponsors though !
http://netcrashers.files.wordpress.com/2006/12/canucks.jpg
LOVE IT
LOVE IT!
http://www.oldfootballshirts.com/en/teams/a/am%C3%A9rica/old-am%C3%A9rica-football-shirt-s7423.html
The home and the away kits are too similar IMO (thats going to cause a problem if they play Penarol in the Copa Libertadores), but they are both quite nice
I must admit I don\'t know much about Club America. Are they any good? :huh:
And the most famous and popular team in México is Chivas Guadalajara (I\'m not a fan), and please there\'s no comparision, Mexico\'s football is crap and America is the cappiest club.
It\'s the crisis,I suppose...
I have a couple of older Club America jerseys which I like. However, they do not have the BIMBO sponsor on them. The shirts are ruined with this sponsor. No way I\'d ever wear anything with BIMBO on it. Could you imagine BIMBO on a Man. U., Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Spus, West Ham, Celti or Rangers Shirt? The fans would be up in arms over it. Get rid of BIMBO for Coca-Cola - then these shirts would be great.
But, I most admit your NIke kit is muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuch better than our Reebok thing......
it will look as if the players are wearing a poncho. they somehow managed to ****-up a nice color combo and, as a masterstroke of irony, nike decided to give them exactly the same template for the away strip.
No doubt a third shirt is needed for matches at Tigres and Monarcas, though this is Mexico, where rules on kit clashing are completely ignored by referees it seems.
this kits are fine but if Nike will make like the white one who makes in January will be a grats kits...
that kit was a great template for this ones...
and to j. garcia america is not the manchester united of mexico they havent won the primera in mexico since like 04. maybe the chelsea or liverpool of mexico.
cant be the greatest and not win your league.... :whistle:
Totally disagree with the stupid comparision that a$$ made.
To those whom approve: Have we focus too much with the details of consumerism and trends of football fashion that will redo a known blunder OR is it that Adidas has failed so miserably (for the most part) that we will approve of anything Nike puts out OR do you act think that this is a good jersey? (I ask not in a rude manner, but to understand why this kit is so heavily approved)
It could be a good (even great) format, but the black/yellow separated by red is just repeating history.
I can agree that it is pretty sleek, however, the other two is up for debate. These colors on this format has been tested and failed. It is ridiculous to have two center sponsors. Also, it is not at all retro. When have we ever seen as a trend in football or any other sport (one jersey in 80\'s hockey is not a trend)? This is modern, if anything.
I wonder if it objects to the cricket team of middle*** too ?
Chivas is like the Celtics: Had one decade of overwhelming glory, followed by league titles every now and then, not the most popular but beloved by their followers, more titles than their rival.
America is like the Lakers: The more popular and more hated team. The wealthiest in the league, fewer titles than their rival but more titles in the last 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 years, had one very popular and very skilled player in their most recent history (Blanco-Magic Johnson).