
Fulham officially revealed the 2010/11 Fulham Home Kit from Kappa which fans can pre-order now! Kappa, a leading brand in European sportswear, has developed this innovative Home shirt for the Fulham Football Club squad at its Kappa R&D centre in Turin, Italy, to the finest quality and design standards.
The new 2010/11 Fulham home kit from Kappa is set to be worn by the First Team during their pre-season campaign ahead of the 2010/11 Barclays Premier League season.
The new kit continues in Fulham’s traditional black and white, and incorporates the well-known Omini Kappa logo of the back-to-back male and female silhouette.
Inspired by Kappa’s Kombat 2010 kit range and is characterised by attention to detail: 3-needle seam with covering, ergonomic cuts on the sides, customised embroidery and the new V neck that gives new personality to the shirt.
These details along with the great stretch-fit enhancement and the hydro-way technology only add to the shirt’s functionality and elegance and allows it to reach the best aesthetic standards in the sports apparel sector.
Thanks to Alex








.jpg)

Comments
Seen West Brom's new kit?
http://cdn.epltalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/west-brom-home-jersey.jpg
anyway, this is a nice, clean kit. it's been mentioned on previous posts but it's exactly the same as Valencia's....but I prefer Fulham's. If the Villa didn't have Nike, I'd be more than happy with Kappa.
Theres nothing Mighty about Villa... and nothing Shitty about Fulham.
Ugly sponsor full stop though.
Sponsor is a joke though!
Nike was clean classic...
It does not have black panels down the sides, and the Omini Kappa logo's are smaller and run at the tips of the shoulders rather than across them.
It's a very good looking kit.
It does not have black panels down the sides, and the Omini Kappa logo's are smaller and run at the tips of the shoulders rather than across them.
It's a very good looking kit.
PS: THE ONLY INNOVATION HERE IS THE NECK SPONSOR. NEVER SEEN SOMETHING LIK THAT
But why the logo is so far up the chest is just plain ... odd.
But I think the Sponsor is placed a little bit to high on the shirt.
Overall very nice. Technical but stylish.
Maybe black sleeves would have been nice?
I've heard that the sponsor is placed so high-up so as to be visible when the players are being interviewed. Pretty pathetic, and a sad indictment of the way football's going. How long before clubs actually incorporate their sponsor's name into the name of the club itself? Just for a little extra moolah..........S'happened before. Anyone remember Talmonte Torino?
why downgrade, nike are heaps better none of that stupid Kappa thing on the shoulders
If it wasnt for that and if the bagde and sponsor went down a few inches, it would be a good kit!
our deal with nike was basically a catalogue deal where we pick a design from one of their ranges, which is usually a year or 2 behind the current range.
villa, arsenal and co have proper deals whereas we had similar deals as MK dons and the lower league clubs.
here we actually get a bespoke design to fulhams standards, unlike what we had at airness or nike
Nice kit otherwise.
dont know why sponsorship of 2 clubs is needed to promote this tho
man utd had ships and devils, coventry had elephants...
whats in a badge.
the colours and the striking design are enough for me.
previous badges have been around for decades, this one is only 10 yrs old, and its growing on people
"LOL "Mighty Villa" and "Shitty Fulham".
Theres nothing Mighty about Villa... and nothing Shitty about Fulham.
Ugly sponsor full stop though."
He's got a point, though. Villa created the game and are former Champions of Europe. Fulham are simply a nice, harmless club based in London.