Football Shirt Culture.com

The ass sponsors are revolting!

If it had to be there it looks better at the bottom of the shirt, and I guess if the sponsors paid for it, they need the guarantee in case the players tuck their shirt in

The shirts are another teamwear job, but that's to be expected for a mid-table team in the Belgian league...

Jeez, I hope that amount of sponsorship never comes to England, it looks absolute garbage!

More sunday league team wear,,,,,what is the point of nike they are just censoreding lazy

the basic design is quite smart - though if you're gonna have halved shirts, have the halves on BOTH FRONT AND BACK!!!! It is so difficult to read a name and number on the back if the back of the shirt is halved, striped, hooped, whatever????

Are Belgian clubs (and French, come to think of it) SO poor that they really need the sponsorship money from all these ads?

further evidence that nike should just give up and go home.

that's not the reason. belgian companies f.e. can't afford the same amount of money to sponsor the clubs, like english or german ones. so these clubs need to sign more contracts, to get on to the same level.

that red curly thing on the shorts sponsor looks like a (ahem)

Needs some censored sponsoring. C'mon, Genk, how do you miss out on selling that area?

the home shirt is like hertha 10 years ago
shit

I just giggled my first giggle on footballshirtculture.com
These are censoreding horrendous Nike should be ashamed, that player should be ashamed, Genk should be ashamed and cars with glass should be ashamed.

gash

give me a break guys these are catalouge kits. how are you going to critic a company over catalouge kits? thats like a adult picking on a little school boy. do you really think nike sat down and said "alright we are going to put all our effort into Genk's kit?" thats not how sponserships work. thats why smaller clubs use catalouge kits, whether its nike, adidas (well every adidas kits are catalouge quality) or puma. its economical and all the kits are pre made so it cut costs down. plus nike's coporation is spread out far more than soccer do you think nike gives a shit about genk? if genk had the same sponsership deal and attention for their kits as do barcelona, arsenal or man u, do you think genk would need all these sponser logos? hell no.


as for the kits i think they are alright. especially the away its a nice throw back to the 2002/2003 kits which were my favorite nike kits.

This would be totally awesome if it wasn't for that damn ass sponsor! It ruins an otherwise great kit.

kit looks o.k....but....you see the back of it it just looks like sh!t

you stupid english people, you all can kiss my ass.
you countrie has got the most fat people popullation on the world stiff upperlips.