Sunday, May 27th

Last update02:20:34 PM GMT

You are here Home
 

New England Crest Launched

E-mail

new-england-crest.jpg

 

The FA has revealed a new version of its iconic ‘Three Lions’ Crest – the visual identity of The FA and England teams. The new design takes its inspiration from the 1948-49 Crest.

The iconic ‘Three Lions’ Crest has been refreshed to give greater visual standout in today’s digital environment.

It draws directly from the significant heritage the Crest embodies – namely the College of Arms version commissioned by The FA in 1948. It is the first time in seven years The FA has made changes to its Crest.

It includes redrawn Three Lions, more authentic-looking Tudor roses and a new colourway for the England Crest – lighter blue – to differentiate it from the previous version and enhance its on-shirt presence.

The England Senior Team will wear the Crest for the first time on 28 March in the match against Slovakia at Wembley Stadium.

Extensive research was conducted by The FA with different groups before the design changes were undertaken in-house. The aim was to establish what ‘The FA’ and ‘England’ represent in people’s lives, and to gain a greater insight into the sense of national identity the ‘Three Lions’ can deliver.

The FA’s Group Commercial Director, Jonathan Hill, commented: “We have taken great care in updating The FA’s ‘Three Lions’ Crest.

"The new designs have been modernised for today’s digital world, whilst also ensuring that they reflect the rich heritage and traditions of the Crest - particularly the 1948-49 version.”

The single-lion emblem was first adopted by Henry II when he became King of England in 1154. It was added to by Richard I (The Lion-heart) who added a second, and then third lion by the end of his reign in 1199.

However it was not until 1872, nine years after The FA was established, that the Crest featured in an England game, adorning the players’ shirts in the world’s first international match, between England and Scotland in Glasgow.

Watch the video here


Click here

Comments 

 
-1 # 2009-03-02 13:47
Horrid. Well a big story about little changes to be true. Except using horrible lighter colours - take note the garish brigh blue Everton badge in recent years. Leave things alone!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 14:36
It does not need the word England above the crest, the whole footballing world knows what the three lions represent.

I would love to see something that represents the nations local Football Associations and not the royal family!

Colours may look better in the cloth.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # jamie2009 2009-03-02 15:21
Is it any different to the old crest?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 23:51
ya...how does this it differ from the old new?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 23:52
oQuote:
ya...how does this it differ from the old new?


oppsss...old one.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 15:51
needs to be darker
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 16:30
I agree with getting rid of \"England\" thats above the badge, it\'s just not needed one bit. But as for the new badge...well there hasn\'t been a drastic change so I reckon there\'s no need to complain just yet because we just have to see what it looks like on the shirt before that.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 16:31
can you really see the badge under the bright lights of Wembley?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 17:44
Much like Engerlunds players this crest looks faded and weak
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 19:26
looks freaky soda like
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 20:18
Who cares, anyway Barzil and Italia alwaya get the gold
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 20:52
This is fine, i agree we do not need the word England (we all know that anyway) but apart from that tiny detail the crest is exactly the same as the crest they said they designed it on and only slightly different from that we\'ve had recently. Get over it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # FDV 2009-03-02 20:53
I\'m not very impressed by this change.
I prefer a darker blue, but this lighter is not bad.
About the word ENGLAND above the crest... I\'m not disturbed by it, was in 1999 when the FA added it on the crest?

What about England\'s away shirt? Will the new badge be posted also on the red shirt?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Jay29ers 2009-03-02 20:53
My word. And how much was a design consultant paid for that? Time for the Crests section on Design Football to have some new additions...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 20:53
The FA are such a bunch of tinkering sh*tbags.
1. There\'s no need to have \'ENGLAND\' above the crest - any football fan knows which country the crest represents.
2. They should keep the lions dark blue to match England\'s navy shorts.

However, I would recommend one change to the FA\'s own crest : the name should be changed from \'The FA\' to \'SWEET FA\' because SWEET F*CK ALL is what they\'re about. GRRRR! :angry:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 21:43
Cutting through all the garbage in this article, here\'s the basic facts

a) The FA wants to promote its new shirt during the recession
b) The old crest wasn\'t printer friendly so they redesigned one that costs half the money to produce and they can iron onto underpants.
c) It looks like the FA chiefs children got at it with a box of crayons
c) the small lion hates you
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 21:45
Quote:
My word. And how much was a design consultant paid for that? Time for the Crests section on Design Football to have some new additions...


Probably more than most of us will earn in 5 years!!! :angry:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 22:16
wait to see what happens with the crest on the shirt itself.

text says design was done in-house which I believe it was so no rich design guys on the back of it.

it\'s positioned as an evolution not a revoltion so I agree with the guy who says chill out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 23:06
i quite like this new crest, seen better but itss safeee!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-02 23:34
Can we take this as final proof then that the England shirt revealed a few weeks back - with its navy lions - is indeed a fake?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 09:42
Quote:
Can we take this as final proof then that the England shirt revealed a few weeks back - with its navy lions - is indeed a fake?


Depends on how you define fake. Between the old FA badge and the old Umbro logo we can now definitely ascertain it\'s not the finished kit, however as has been pointed out the FA did their own rebranding in-house with no input from Umbro and none of us know when Umbro took the decision to rebrand in relation to producing prototypes for the England shirt.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 00:52
it\'s terrible just like the england team, ROI are going to SA 2010
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 00:54
Maybe the lighter blue is a hint at the colour of the shirt trim and shorts of the new kit - going back to a lighter blue as they wore with the Admiral kits of the later 70\'s and early 80\'s...........

Personally I like - bout it would look better without the \'England\' above it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 17:23
Thing is though, Slovakia wear all-blue, and when there\'s a clash of shorts it\'s more often than not the home team that will change. So I think England will probably - and I stress, just probably - wear white shorts in that game which may or may not be the first choice.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Amadeus Angelillo 2009-03-03 02:26
This picture doesn\'t do the design credit.
I\'ve checked out the design on the official site and the tudor roses look as they should with the green and yellow detailing and the lions look so much natural and cooler, almost as they should.
I agree about the England ontop of the crest, it is not needed, but it acts as a compliment to the design. It is head and shoulders above the design in 1998...which was abysmal.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 02:27
That\'s mental likey
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Amadeus Angelillo 2009-03-03 02:47
i have a feeling that the new jersey wont have the england line along the top of the crest...check out umbros new album...this is an add for the new shirt and shows the crest with just the 3 lions design, what u reckon?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 10:23
The worst badge ever!!!!!!!!!! :angry:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # pachyderm 2009-03-03 13:16
looks better than the umbro kit... :dry:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-03 13:21
If it hadn\'t been pointed out nobody would have noticed. I wonder how much of the F.A\'s money was wasted paying whichever consultant came up with this?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-04 16:15
makes me laugh that some people who are not bothered still take time to write a comment saying they are not bothered - but are obviously bothered by others taking an interest and bothered enough to not only read the story but write a response!!! ha ha!!!

Do you write to the makers of all food you don\'t have a problem with and say thanks I have no complaints? Do you write to Agony Aunts in the paper to say you don\'t have a wife playing away, or problem at work??!!!!

:s
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-05 05:30
hang on, this badge seems to be a leap back, towards the 50\'s or 60\'s, does this also mean that we\'ll end up with heavy cloth shirts for Posibly the hotest world cup ever... thats if we quali... Well done the fa, managed to spend endless money on somethin that didnt need doin, wish they do somethin useful... like help out the clubs foldin in the lower leagues..eg weymouht, bournemouth, luton, rotherham, darlington to name a few
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-05 11:36
Well said Phil

Now there\'s a man with sense. Football\'s going to the dogs and someone\'s being paid to colour things in differently.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-05 14:24
Nice one Phil, as Paul said \"you are a man with sense\" and i have to agree. They seem to have money to throw about at pointless things like this when they could do it themselves but they cant help teams out that need it. They really need to get there priorities right.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-05 14:32
Yeah, they need to gain control again. Football used to be owned by FA, proud but humble. Now the FA are more than prepared to allow the media to detroy it. England are the team to follow one day, the team to slag off the next. A little humility and a press that allows us to TRY and be the best (when we only were once in \'66) would go a long way.

But I\'m onto other topics not for this aricle I realise. Maybe the FA should resort to traditional values in ALL they do, not just badges. Get footy out of the gutter.

Rather than \"hey look we have a shiney new image\" I\'d rather hear \"hey we CARE about the game again\".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-06 16:11
it\'s too old school...

i could design a better badge.

3 navy blue lions heads ( one big one in the middle and 2 smaller heads behind) each one having a different emotion, glare, roaring and desire, each charactistic lion should describe wht this passionate country is about, the word england or EFA should be in old english caligraphy text with a beaming gold star above, all on a silver sheild, same shape to arsenal\'s...

now THATS A BADGE!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-06 16:52
Quote:
it\'s too old school...

i could design a better badge.

3 navy blue lions heads ( one big one in the middle and 2 smaller heads behind) each one having a different emotion, glare, roaring and desire, each charactistic lion should describe wht this passionate country is about, the word england or EFA should be in old english caligraphy text with a beaming gold star above, all on a silver sheild, same shape to arsenal\'s...

now THATS A BADGE!


http://img17.imageshack.us/my.php?image=englandnewbadge.jpg

took me 15 mins!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-06 17:22
I can see from the image it only took 15 minutes. Its good but its not the 3 lions which have more of a royal feel to them so i think having the shield of lion on the shirt makes it like you are playing as a team for your country and not just as a team.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-06 18:52
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/prophecy/armageddon/images/richardIshield1.gif

richard I sheild
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-06 21:28
I meant having the shield with the royal background to it it will make the players feel like they are playing as a team as well as for there country so thats why we should keep our heritage rather than uptdate it to something that has no meaning apart from a modernised version of the original.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-13 16:38
From what I\'ve heard and seen. The actual shirt will not have the \'England\' part above the crest. Only the FA logo will have that. The crest itself in detailed design is a huge improvement over the current one but the light blue colour is up for argument.

I think for the shirt we are going to see a retro feel(from hints at the Umbro site) with a collared shirt, rather plain, and a red Umbro logo, and possibly a shirt detailed in blue OR red. Also, I think to we will see \"ghost\" image(s) of the crest somewhere on the shirt like in those retched fake shirts that were leaked. The new Ireland kit has this as well on the arm.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2009-03-14 17:12
why isn\'t the queen\'s boat race on the badge?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh