Thursday, May 23rd

Last update01:54:42 AM GMT

                     Creative Football T-Shirts at Footytees.com - Featuring prints by a range of talented artists

You are here Sponsorship Nike to Sell Umbro
 

Nike to Sell Umbro

E-mail

nike to sell umbro

Umbro, the UK-based football brand is to be divested by its parent company Nike.

Umbro was bought by Nike in 2008 and almost immediately rebranded with the Tailored By range.  Cited as inspirational in the football kit evolution towards more understated designs from the rest of the "big four" (Puma, adidas and Nike), Tailored By was lauded by sports fashion commentators and quickly built up Umbro's credibility, which had been lagging in previous years.

However, despite increased expenditure and high-profile marketing campaigns - including England shirt launches employing stars of other sports and music - revenue in 2011 was lower than back in 2006 and ongoing losses have led Nike to the conclusion that they should focus on the core brand and other better performing areas such as Jordan and Converse.

Buy Football t-shirts at footytees.com - New shirts every week

What the future holds for Umbro may be a sale to another manufacturer, such as adidas, or it may be that Umbro can somehow return to being self-sufficient - in line with reduced funding from Nike.  Other scenarios are worryingly bleaker.

                                                       Click Here for Jay's take on events over at DesignFootball.com


available now

Comments 

 
-13 # 2012-06-05 10:26
good maybe the nike cheapness crept into umbro kits since they were bought
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2012-06-06 01:43
which led to Umbro's kitss being so repetitive and boring
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+39 # Donnypool 2012-06-05 10:38
Warrior Sports should buy the Umbro brand.

Warrior get a respected name and avoid all the 'mickey mouse brand' rubbish that's been going around. They also would (probably) get the likes of Aitor Throup and all the good design/tailoring/atmosphere of Umbro.

Umbro get the kind of financial backing that chucks £25m at a kit deal with LFC.

It would work quite well, no?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2012-06-05 10:52
No. I doubt anyone will be willing to throw the same sort of money at Umbro as Nike have done.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+15 # 2012-06-05 11:50
Uh, Warrior is already a subsidiary of another major sports apparel maker, New Balance. Before the Liverpool deal, they just made equipment for ice hockey teams.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # 2012-06-05 13:10
Yer and there first go at football kits with Liverpool went well didnt it
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # 2012-06-05 14:07
Personally, I think both new Liverpool kits are fantastic. Better than the awful gingham rubbish that Nike have produced for Man Utd.
Apart from the most recent England kit, the umbro 'Tailored by' range has been fantastic and its a real pity that Nike don't think that it has been worthwhile. If Warrior were to buy umbro then we would see two brands who understand and care about the history and heritage of the clubs that they supply join forces. Both brands are capable of something unique, unlike adidas and Nike who churn out limited, uninspired crap over and over again.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+17 # 2012-06-05 14:19
'Tailored By' has been worthwhile but the fact is Umbro aren't making a profit. Great design doren't sell football shirts. Famous clubs and players do.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-06-05 16:18
Don't forget lacrosse.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-06 06:32
and lacrosse gear
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-06-09 14:41
Actually, they made equipment for lacrosse
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-05 17:32
I can definitely see both Warrior and Umbro profiting from that. Good call.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+24 # 2012-06-05 11:01
Seems a shame to me, Umbro have produced some classy kits over the past few years. However, could kind of see it coming based on the Man city move!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # 2012-06-05 11:07
there goes the england kit
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-06-05 11:16
Nike paid 285 million quid for Umbro in 2008....probably worth 285 quid now
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-05 11:48
Have the last couple of England kits deliberately been poor designs badly so that no-one cares when Nike take over?

That's one conspiracy theory.

Maybe another manufacturer will buy the rights to the brand like JD did with Fila and Canterbury.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-06-05 13:25
Just another American screw up. Goes to show you, don't trust an American company to make good football gear.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-6 # 2012-06-05 14:20
Good football gear has nothing to do with it. Umbro is not a desireable brand in the eyes of the punters.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # grahamager 2012-06-05 14:51
Oh bite me, plenty of Euro companies have screwed up kits as well.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2012-06-05 14:52
Quoting GermanyRulz:
Just another American screw up. Goes to show you, don't trust an American company to make good football gear.

Goes to show you are an idiot and do not know how the buisness world works
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2012-06-05 14:56
Quoting Kraut c unt:
Goes to show you are an idiot and do not know how the buisness world works


Yes, Nike are in it to make money. Umbro is not making money.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+13 # 2012-06-05 13:40
LIVERPOOL ARE AWFUL
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+20 # 2012-06-05 14:11
it's the time to come back to your greatness, Umbro
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2012-06-05 15:17
THE FA WONT LIKE THIS NEWS AS UMBRO HAVE PROVIDED MAJOR BACKING AND FUNDS FOR THE BURTON ACADEMY.(ST. GEORGES) IF THEY LOSE NIKE BACKING THAT COULD JEPODISE THIS. UMBRO HAVE BEEN WITH ENGLAND SINCE 66 I BELIEVE. UMBRO HAVE BEEN BETTER SINCE NIKE TOOK OVER BUT NIKE IS A BUSINESS AND IF UMBRO IS LOSING THE BUSINESS MONEY IT WILL BE CUT AND NIKE WONT CARE WHAT HAPPENS TO IT
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # 2012-06-05 16:19
Not 100% True.
England have had Admiral as a shirt sponsor as well as Umbro
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # 2012-06-05 16:21
Nike should have just absorbed Umbro into the fold. Nike would sponsor England just as easily as Umbro would.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2012-06-05 15:44
Umbro was pretty good before the Nike take-over, I have a bunch of shirts that were specifically designed for lower league Dutch teams, with sponsors and numbers woven in, instead of being crappy stickers.

Then Nike bought Umbro, and things hit rock bottom pretty quickly.

Ultimately, Umbro being bought by another brand (that isn't Adidas or Puma) or going out of business is better than staying in Nike's grubby mits.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Starkso 2012-06-05 15:58
What was even the point Nike?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+45 # Tim1902 2012-06-05 18:00
Lets see:

Buy up a competitor. Produce really expensive kits for a handful of clubs with comparatively small fanbases.

Make them a fancy new website after extensive, expensive rebranding. Don't actually allow people to buy any of your products from the website.

Produce stunning kits for Peruvian clubs most people have never heard of. Do not distribute said kits outside of Peru.

Allow all of their contracts with English clubs to lapse.

Release a hugely expensive range of "concept wear" - entirely in grey.

Bring out a new England kit every 9 months, but reduce the price so that retailers can sell them for £10 each after a couple of months, ensuring nobody buys them at full price when they are released.

Only sponsor players with extremely limited appeal such as Michael Owen and Darren Bent.

In the midst of a revival in interest in vintage football shirts only re-release old England and Manchester City shirts. Do not attempt to target a wider audience with their products.

Sign up Umbro's most successful club to Nike.

Announce with mock surprise that your business model for Umbro has not been financially viable and that you are about to sell.

Hmm. It's almost as though Nike wanted Umbro to fail...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-06-06 15:04
Everyone loves a conspiracy theory.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Starkso 2012-06-06 20:45
Quoting Tim1902:
Lets see:

Buy up a competitor. Produce really expensive kits for a handful of clubs with comparatively small fanbases.

Make them a fancy new website after extensive, expensive rebranding. Don't actually allow people to buy any of your products from the website.

Produce stunning kits for Peruvian clubs most people have never heard of. Do not distribute said kits outside of Peru.

Allow all of their contracts with English clubs to lapse.

Release a hugely expensive range of "concept wear" - entirely in grey.

Bring out a new England kit every 9 months, but reduce the price so that retailers can sell them for £10 each after a couple of months, ensuring nobody buys them at full price when they are released.

Only sponsor players with extremely limited appeal such as Michael Owen and Darren Bent.

In the midst of a revival in interest in vintage football shirts only re-release old England and Manchester City shirts. Do not attempt to target a wider audience with their products.

Sign up Umbro's most successful club to Nike.

Announce with mock surprise that your business model for Umbro has not been financially viable and that you are about to sell.

Hmm. It's almost as though Nike wanted Umbro to fail...

It was rhetorical mate, i'm quite aware of Nike's dirty deeds.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-07-24 02:09
Here Here
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # 2012-06-05 16:27
KEEP UMBRO INDEPENDENT
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+10 # 2012-06-05 16:58
I do hope Umbro find some kind of backer or return to some sort of financial stability. Some of the Tailored by stuff has been nice, though the current Ireland kit and previous England one with the little Georges crosses at the back I wasn't wild about. Umbro's Ireland kits have been hit and miss. I would like to see them surviving, they have a long history particularly in the English game
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-05 17:27
Speaking personally, as someone who has supported Nottingham Forest (Umbro since 1986), they haven't produced a nice shirt since the League 1 promotion season (five years ago). It's a sad reflection, as back in the mid 90's, right up to about 2002, Umbro did really nice designs, but since then, not so nice. Can you really blame Nike? Umbro need to start again, and go back to thinking 'right-here we have a team-what will look good on the pitch and off?' instead of 'we'll come up with a stupid slogan and forget why we make shirts in the first place'.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+17 # 2012-06-05 18:15
I have to reiterate what Jon said. Good shirt design doesn't sell kits; big name clubs and big name players do. Other than England, their big name teams are Man City (who are moving to Nike just as they're becoming a "big club"), Rangers (who are bankrupt), Ireland (who missed the last WC), Sweden (who also missed the last WC), and LOSC Lille (who only have mid-level support in France despite having a good team).

Nike simply didn't give Umbro enough market share to be successful. They needed to merge more fully and then transfer a bunch of big sponsorships to re-establish the brand. They should have given them one of their top English club teams (Arsenal or Man U, or even Aston Villa or Everton), a big South American team (like Santos, Corinthians, or Boca Juniors), a club in Russia, another couple clubs in France, a handful of German clubs, and a few more competitive national sides. They also put almost 0 effort into their boot line, which should have been completely revamped to match the Nike line in terms of quality and diversity.

Nike seemed intent on leaving Umbro as a 2nd or 3rd tier brand, below Puma, Adidas, and themsleves, when they should have been building the company to match those others

All in all, it's really sad because Umbro has been putting out some QUALITY kits for their marquee clubs and countries in my opinion, and I don't want to see them go to shite again.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-05 19:46
Even for Nike most the vast majority of the income that comes from shirt sales comes from the 3 or 4 biggest teams they sponsor.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2012-06-06 19:04
Everton were Umbro until now.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-05 20:11
ah man its a shame. Umbro seemed like they were doing pretty good designs.

first off we may view Nike as the villain here but ever since they bought Umbro the Tailored By brand has revolutionized the football design world. its almost if not is mainstream to design a polo shirt and call it tailored. it really was a fresh air that we havent seen in Umbro before 2008. so for that i give Nike thanks for pumping some class back into Umbro by doing a complete overhaul of the brand

however i competley agree with Sloth the name of the game is money. Who is wearing your shirt and who is promoting it. and i dont want to basically repeat Sloth's point but its very true Umbro didnt have too much room to play in. they basically only had England and Man City. and something that i noticed was that Umbro wasnt to revolutionary when it came to technology. i dont know how much autonomy Nike gave to Umbro but when it came to the kits Umbro focused to much on the tailored look and cotton comfort but nothing else that really put Umbro up on par with Nike and adidas. and when it came down to the boots they are basically Nike boot chasis with Umbro designs. dont get me wrong Nike/Umbro's boots are the best i am a proud owner of a pair of Umbro GT II and they are by far the best boots i have ever worn (i didnt think the nike t90 stud layout was going to work on a speed boot but it does the job very very well). but there was nothing that really set Umbro apart from Nike cleat wise. it kind of reminds me here in the states we have Ford and we have Lincoln all lincoln is is a ford with wood trimming, thats it.

i think Nike genuinely tried to make Umbro work i mean what company would buy another company just for it to fail? and side note the nationality of a brand has nothing to do with whether a company succeeds or fails. look at adidas and reebok, reebok shrunk from making football kits to just making athletic equipment. and guess what adidas is german. anyways idk i hope Umbro can get some funding from Nike and start up again as a independent. if Umbro can combine the Tailored by approach with the same technology know how that umbro had before the take over im sure they'd be a great brand. but unless nike can give umbro a second chance i hope Umbro doesnt fall into the hands of another brand be it adidas or puma.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-05 20:45
You guys don't get it...I knew that some time Nike would sell Umbro and I'm happy with it really. Nike haven't respected Umbro at all these last few years, they didn't give them much attention and Umbro are in my opinion one of the best brands! their tailoring are class, shame they were with nike! Nike are shite always...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-05 21:02
The brand was probably devalued by all the cheap Umbro branded tat you can buy at places like Sports Direct.

There was a time from the end of the 80s until the mid 90s when Umbro were great. Plenty of innovation and a proper brand leader in kit design. They need some of that magic back.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2012-06-06 13:27
# Hump Soul Brother is exactly right. The brand was completely devalued by Sports Direct.

And its not about respect (or lack of) from Nike. The fact is Umbro don't have the assets (players or teams) to leverage sales.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-8 # 2012-06-05 21:32
Good riddance; this "Tailored By" range is garbage now. It might have been an interesting theme for one season or so, but they won't stop with it and the shirts are, to be honest, crap. I want a football kit, not something drawn up by some twat in fashion design.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-06 13:27
FYI - Most kit designers studied fashion design at Uni.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2012-06-06 00:10
I have NEVER owened a kit by nike

Tho have had countless Umbro classics.... The tailored by gear was decent too tho not many clubs in the stable
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-06 08:12
They could try designing different kits for each club instead of cheap templates.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2012-06-06 08:35
Tim 1902,
Absolutely fantastically summed up.
Let' s hope they find financial stability and keep on pruducing their great tailored by kits but remember, the "panels" concept was already there [see England Away 2009], Umbro has always been technically and aesthetically superior even before the "new course". A retro flavour was always kept even in the modern designs pre-"tailored by"
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # 2012-06-06 08:46
Regardless of what people think of kit design or brand image, Umbro must be one of the oldest, if not THE oldest, sportswear manufacturers in England.
If Nike kill them off that's 88 years of history down the pan, and that's a crying shame.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2012-06-06 13:29
Yes that would be a great shame. Unfortunately history is meaningless if the brand cannot be relevant in the modern marketplace.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2012-06-06 08:54
T Minus,
Sorry but in addition to supreme aesthetics there is also much thought study and technology in Umbro kits.
Or do you think technology means employing "politically correct" plastic bottles to make kits that absolutely DO NOT DRY ("dri fit" my feet...)? (see Barcelona & other complaints last year).
I am glad you recognise your Umbro boots are the best, let me remind you that the Umbro Speciali line has an Italian name because they had it hand made in Italy with Italian leather, and theu were the first to do so, so forget the Ronaldinho Nike boots and all that rubbish, which in the least has come with 20 years delay. The template, if there is one, is Umbro' s and not the other way around. Umbro have simply followed with class in the new fashion of multicolour "space boots" with diagonal laces etc. but with their distinctive trademark and quality.

Umbro now just need to find stability and manage to fit in the few spaces agressive nike puma adidas are leaving (only because clubs just look at the packfuls of money they are being offered for sponsorships), the way joma, errea or macron are doing with contracts aboroad and starting even from small teams. I mean, the latter is Italian and relatively new, and if even Diadora managed to sponsor Scotland, it can' t be that difficult!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2012-06-06 13:31
But here's the killer. In the space in the market left by the big brands you are talking about a tiny percentage of market share that is left for the rest. Very hard to be profitable when there is so little money left on the table for the rest to fight over.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2012-06-06 15:12
You are quite right Jon...
But I do not see another way to go... Situation is complicated, but maybe tight cost control and investment should allow them to break new markets, even though we would be back to pre-2008, when Umbro for example "discovered" futsal and beach soccer, only to be soon followed by our friend Nike who barged in also there with shedfuls of banknotes. There is almost no escape, the big ones will simply wait for you to find something new and then come in and kick you out, but maybe also starting from basics in "obscure" or less heard of countries might help creating a good base so as to wait for the big shot at some big club at the end of previous contracts.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-06 15:28
They need a new approach for sure. Playing the big boys at their own game will only go one way. I do fear that the brand will end up being some kind of semi-ironic heritage brand like Gola.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # 2012-06-06 12:11
Nike quite frankly disgust me. It's not just man city, it's santos FC too, because of the Neymar appeal they've basically stolen 2 of umbro's best and most promising brands. That's business for you.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-06-06 15:33
censored nike... free Umbro !!!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2012-06-06 21:05
Saying that, the last 2 Wales umbro kits have been superb - both in terms of desgin and quality. The away kits too have also been pretty good. This may explain why they are now a tenner at JJB!

Shame.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2012-06-07 09:17
Umbro made the best kits for Chelsea!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2012-06-07 10:39
It's a shame that Umbro and Reebok didn't merge back when they were both successful English companies based in the North West, then we could have still had a successful British sportswear company instead of selling to the Americans and Germans.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-07 15:06
Uh-oh...Mike Ashley/Sports Direct are bidders...

http://www.scotsman.com/the-scotsman/business/mike-ashley-s-sports-direct-makes-play-for-kit-maker-umbro-1-2336945

Possible rebranding as SportsDirect.com Tailored By Umbro can't be far behind.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2012-06-08 18:21
this is not good news! I hope there will be a solution. I've been a fan of Umbro ever since.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-08 19:58
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
NIKE É UMA MERDA AQUI É ADIDAS PORRAAAAAAAAAA
O BONDE DAS 3 LISTRAS!!!!!
ESPANHA NÃO PASSA DA 1ª FASE DA EURO!!!
VAI DAR SUÉCIA NESSE CARALHO, PQP!!!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2012-06-09 21:23
I like Umbro the most out of all the football kit manufacturers.

The 'Tailored by' range was a breath of fresh air and kind of made football kits fashionable. The other brands then seemed to latch on to the retro theme with their kits.

Nike should look at their own brand. Their kits are horrible this year. Arsenal have have really nice Nike kits but the last two kits (2011/12 + 2012/13) have been awful, especially the 2011/12 away kit.

Just home Umbro can survive as it has so much history and as i've said is my favourite kit manufacturer.

Never really been a fan of Nike kits.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2012-06-11 10:36
Quoting sloth:
I have to reiterate what Jon said. Good shirt design doesn't sell kits; big name clubs and big name players do. Other than England, their big name teams are Man City (who are moving to Nike just as they're becoming a "big club"), Rangers (who are bankrupt), Ireland (who missed the last WC), Sweden (who also missed the last WC), and LOSC Lille (who only have mid-level support in France despite having a good team).

Nike simply didn't give Umbro enough market share to be successful. They needed to merge more fully and then transfer a bunch of big sponsorships to re-establish the brand. They should have given them one of their top English club teams (Arsenal or Man U, or even Aston Villa or Everton), a big South American team (like Santos, Corinthians, or Boca Juniors), a club in Russia, another couple clubs in France, a handful of German clubs, and a few more competitive national sides. They also put almost 0 effort into their boot line, which should have been completely revamped to match the Nike line in terms of quality and diversity.

Nike seemed intent on leaving Umbro as a 2nd or 3rd tier brand, below Puma, Adidas, and themsleves, when they should have been building the company to match those others

All in all, it's really sad because Umbro has been putting out some QUALITY kits for their marquee clubs and countries in my opinion, and I don't want to see them go to shite again.

They did give umbro Santos
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2012-06-11 21:08
i will buy it. where to sign?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-09-05 11:51
Fantastic 4 Nike absolutely good move
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh