Monday, May 28th

Last update02:20:34 PM GMT

You are here Sponsorship Tottenham Hotspur announce Under Armour Kit Deal
 

Tottenham Hotspur announce Under Armour Kit Deal

E-mail

spurs - under armourTottenham Hotspur Football Club and Under Armour, the U.S.-based leader in performance apparel, footwear, and accessories, announced today a global partnership agreement and technical sponsorship worth up to £50million.

The five-year collaboration is Under Armour’s first kit supply agreement with a Barclays Premier League team and represents the Brand’s largest European team sponsorship.

Beginning with the 2012/2013 season, Under Armour will provide Tottenham Hotspur with performance apparel, including training wear and playing kit for the Club’s First and Academy teams, together with replica product for the Club’s supporters around the world.

Founded in 1996 by current President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Kevin Plank, Under Armour is the originator of performance apparel - gear engineered to keep athletes dry and light throughout the course of a game, practice or workout. Recognised as the fastest growing performance brand in the United States, Under Armour has an unrivalled reputation for innovation with every product designed to improve athlete performance.

Daniel Levy, Tottenham Hotspur Chairman, said: "We are delighted that Under Armour will become our new technical partner from 2012 onwards. They are an extremely ambitious brand with global aspirations, making them ideal partners for Tottenham Hotspur.”

Under Armour CEO and Founder, Kevin Plank, added: “This is a highly significant and exciting partnership for Under Armour. Aligning with an elite organization like Tottenham Hotspur demonstrates our deep commitment to growing the Under Armour brand in the UK and to showcasing our apparel and footwear on the world’s most prestigious athletic stages.”

While this marks Under Armour’s first Barclays Premier League team kit supply agreement, select players continue to wear Under Armour boots during Barclays Premier League matches. In addition to Tottenham Hotspur, Under Armour’s European athletic partners include Bundesliga side Hannover 96 and the Welsh Rugby Union.


Click here

Comments 

 
+4 # Cohen_FCN 2011-03-08 21:01
That's really cool.
I cannot wait until the new kits were presented
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2011-03-09 02:37
Not only that, but I like that Under Armour is realizing that football is the world's most popular sport, and that's thte way to really get sales: make a European jersey so that thousands upon thousands of fans will buy the jersey and maybe more under a armour gear plus maybe the stores will start to sell more football gear in USA!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+19 # 2011-03-08 21:01
Wow, that's a huge surprise! Under Armour?!? Before negative votes and icons, we must to wait at least to see the firsts designs...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # Banned in DC 2011-03-08 23:30
Well, no matter what it'll be a step up from Puma. But still nowhere close to Umbro...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2011-03-09 19:41
i thought they were going to adidas, plus quoting

'The five-year collaboration is Under Armour’s first kit supply agreement with a Barclays Premier League team and represents the Brand’s largest European team sponsorship.'

ARIS FC are sponsored by UA and are the Brand’s largest European team sponsorship.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piPrkoQFVqo
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2011-03-10 14:47
No, it's also Hannover 96 sponsored by Under Armour.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2011-03-12 23:57
Quoting Athas:
i thought they were going to adidas, plus quoting

'The five-year collaboration is Under Armour’s first kit supply agreement with a Barclays Premier League team and represents the Brand’s largest European team sponsorship.'

ARIS FC are sponsored by UA and are the Brand’s largest European team sponsorship.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piPrkoQFVqo



Spurs are bigger than Aris I would guess.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2011-04-13 22:07
Well Umbro is NIKE afterall
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-6 # 2011-03-08 21:07
B awfull!! like a sunday league team kit or non league poo
Gutted
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-16 # 2011-03-08 21:14


well you lads get to inherit Americas football wear......that is super unlucky....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-17 # 2011-03-09 05:58
Why do people keep putting negative votes to these kind of statements. Its just true. Americans are self centred bastards who probably think Tottenham are an Ice Hockey team or something.

If the designs are good than thats great but youve just got to face that Americans are crap at making football kits.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6 # 2011-03-09 17:18
Quoting USA:
Why do people keep putting negative votes to these kind of statements. Its just true. Americans are self centred bastards who probably think Tottenham are an Ice Hockey team or something.

If the designs are good than thats great but youve just got to face that Americans are crap at making football kits.



lol thats a good laugh, you want to make this a pissing contest? the english are the most self-centered of them all if its not english, its not good! and nike has never made a good football kit?

good call that americans dont know who Tottenham are, cause clearly myself and the other americans on this site thought we were looking at ice hockey teams, thanks for the heads up

anywho this is a major coup for UA and I wouldn't doubt that they paid a pretty penny to secure the rights of an EPL team.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2011-03-10 07:42
1: I'm not from England
2: I hate Nike (and they're from the US)

Thanks
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+15 # 2011-03-09 18:34
You realize Nike is American, don't you? I think the kits they've been making over the past couple of years have been better than what any other company has put out there, except for maybe Umbro (which is owned by Nike....) Check your European footy elitism at the door please
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-6 # 2011-03-10 07:40
Point proven. THANKS FOR THE NEGATIVE VOTES.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-10 17:00
Quoting USA:
Point proven. THANKS FOR THE NEGATIVE VOTES. :-)


the point being that you're a douche troll?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-10-06 02:11
Not all of us Americans love American football! Go Spurs! Go with whomever makes your kit!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Cohen_FCN 2011-03-08 21:16
Hey Guys
I think Under Armour has good designs and in the Bundesliga for Hannover 96 they had designed wonderful kits like that:
http://www.footballshirtculture.com/10/11-kits/hannover-96-under-armour-2010-2011-kits.html or these kits:
http://www.footballshirtculture.com/09/10-kits/hannover-96-under-armour-2009-2010-kits.html
and i think Puma hat really bad designs in the recent years, so let's wait until the shirts will be presented.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2011-03-08 21:27
Under Arsenal
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+13 # 2011-03-08 21:46
Quoting TOPS:
Under Arsenal


Not in Champions League, hahahaha
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4 # 2011-03-08 21:56
Quoting TOPS:
Under Arsenal


Arsenal looked pretty good against Barca today.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+22 # 2011-03-08 22:00
Quoting Jeff:
Arsenal looked pretty good against Barca today.

Oh, yes, 0 attempts on target, 0 attempts off target, 32% ball possession... fantastic performance.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-13 # 2011-03-08 23:12
Only stat that matters is the scoreboard, and before the ref effectively ended the game with the single worst decision I've ever seen on a football pitch (because it was a completely unforced blunder), Arsenal were 3-2 up on Barcelona after 180 mins played. For the ref to make that decision, but not penalize anyone for putting their hands on van Persie's throat just a few mins earlier is disgraceful. Also, if we're going after timewasting, why did Almunia have to run all the way down to the corner flag in order to get a ball for a goal kick? The ball boys for Barca were screwing us, that's why. And for people to say it wouldn't have mattered, I disagree. Maybe van Persie finishes the Bendtner chance, and we win on away goals. Maybe if we don't have 10 men we get more than one attacking chance in the last 10 mins. We'll never know because the ref blew the game up after 60 mins.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-11 # 2011-03-08 23:13
Sorry 150 mins played. My mistake
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # 2011-03-09 00:15
150 or 180 minutes played, it makes no difference - Barcelona were by and far the better team in the first half and should have been ahead regardless. Let's not even get into the debate of who was better through both matches.

Were they a much improved side from the mauling they got last year? Yes. Are they within touching distance? Not even by a mile.

However, your team got handed a censoreding lifeline via an own goal to tie up the score on aggregate, and had they kept 11 men behind the ball (whoever says Wenger is above parking the bus and won't resort to it, should be shot - they were so deep they could have all been inside the 6 yard box and it wouldn't have changed their base positioning), they could have won on away goals.

Secondly, stop your censoreding. Refs have bad games too. Other teams have been screwed over by absurd referring errors or mistakes - it's quite common, so stop complaining about how a weak yellow card got RVP kicked off. Shit happens. You think Arsenal got it bad? Try talking to Chelsea fans who saw the 09 Semi at Stamford Bridge! THAT is called getting screwed by a referee. What happened to Arsenal was nothing in comparison (I don't support either club, for the record), absolutely nothing.

Stop complaining. Arsenal just weren't good enough. Sometimes you've got to beat the referee as well as the opposing team, and Arsenal had every censoreding chance they could have ever asked for to do so, and they didn't. Don't go blaming the referee. Was it a bad yellow? Yes. Was RVP already in the book? Yes. Do the FIFA laws of the game dictate that kicking the ball out of play after the head official has blown their whistle is a offense that can and should be punishable by a yellow card? Yes.

Here's all you need to know. 90 minutes played. 0 shots. Attacking football my ass. Arsenal were embarrassing today regardless of the ref.

God some Arsenal fans can be so one-sided.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4 # 2011-03-09 02:53
So you get to use "could have" in the sense that Barcelona could have been ahead in the first half, but I'm not allowed to say that Arsenal could have scored a second goal, and therefore won the tie if they hadn't been down to 10 men? What awful logic that is. The simple facts are that when Arsenal were reduced to 10 men unjustifiably, they were in actual fact up 3-2 in the tie with 150 mins played. The simple fact is that we'll never know how that tie would have ended under normal sporting circumstances.

On another note, I just love how if Barcelona had played all the football and lost that somehow would have been a tragedy, but when Arsenal play all the football and lose or draw to lesser teams like Birmingham City then that's us getting our just desserts for being a "weak" team. Wonderfully consistent, yet again. Barcelona are a club that is financed by huge, unsustainable debt. Barcelona are a club with whinging, cheating, no class players and staff (see sprinklers on Mourinho last season and ball boys against Arsenal this year). Barcelona are a club backed by an unflinchingly biased media echochamber in the Catalan press. FFS they're so bad I'm actually inclined to root for Real Madrid, and I hate those bunch of fascists more than I can put into words.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-10 16:12
sorry mate, but arsenal were never the better team.
they got out-shot, out-possessed and outclassed.
end of story.

stop trying to justify it, you got beaten.
instead of complaining about how it was everyone elses fault. 56 minutes in you were still getting it handed to you, but i hear you making the claim that the ref "blew the game". here's a fun fact: up until the 56th minute, you still didn't have a shot. not even on net in general.

last, but certainly not least, you may want to pay attention this one sweetheart..


DON'T COME INTO A SPURS THREAD LOOKING FOR A FIGHT!!


you came in here with the intention of making a snide arsenal remark, and you ended up looking like a complete ass when someone fired back at you. don't come into a thread thinking you're going to start a fight and then get upset when someone points out the obvious..

you're only embarrassing your club and yourself with that kinda behaviour.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-6 # 2011-03-10 18:41
And yet, I'm pretty sure I've read something in the rules about goals counting towards result of the game, not shots. The fact is before the game was ruined as a contest we were in the lead for the tie, and even on the night. The simple fact is that in the first leg Barcelona tired in the last half hour and we took the advantage and won the first game. There's nothing to say that such a thing wouldn't have happened in the second leg as well. We'll simply never know because the ref spoiled the game as a contest.

I'll guarantee this though: 1) if Spurs run into Barca, the won't give them nearly the games that Arsenal did (which is why 'Arry came out today and said they're praying not to get Barca). 2) If Barca-Spurs and Arsenal-Milan had been the Round of 16 pairings, it would have been you going out and us moving on, so don't talk so much shit based on a random draw. 3) the only reason Spurs are talking so much shit about the Champions League this year is because they know they won't get the opportunity to play in it for another 50 years. Start qualifying for it for 15 years straight, and it becomes less of a big deal year to year.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # 2011-03-10 20:54
Quoting Grant:
And yet, I'm pretty sure I've read something in the rules about goals counting towards result of the game, not shots.


ohhhhh.. THAT'S why you lost!
it wasn't the ref. or the fact that you were outshot. or outpossessed. or outpassed. it was because you didn't score as many goals as barca!! thanks for clarifying that for me.

if you wanna keep beating your chest about the ref spoiling the contest try to mention diaby killing messi right under the refs nose in the box in the 33rd. koscielny getting a second yellow when he took down pedro resulting in the penalty. or would you rather call the officiating into question when you feel it only serves your case?

i'm not talking shit so much as i'm saying "stop complaining" and/or "don't complain in a spurs thread". you won a game against barca which i wholeheartedly applaud, but you lost on aggro. instead of holding your head up you're going off about how unfair everything is and how much everyone else sucks. you're talking in hypotheticals about how if you'd had played a different team, or if you'd had all of the calls go your way, then things would've been different; but that's not how it played out and flaming a spurs thread won't change that.

and the reason spurs fans are "talking so much shit" about the champions league is because we're happy that we've made it to the round of 8 on our first champions league run. wanna stop hearing spurs fans talking shit? don't hang out in threads about the club lol.




and lastly, yes, qualifying for the champions league 15 years in a row is a great accomplishment. i hope your club can reach that accomplishment one day.

now how bout we ignore each other until we go away?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # 2011-03-11 14:42
We were ahead on goals when the ref blew the game. So regardless of how many goals Barca could have, might have, or probably should have scored prior to that point, the fact remains that they didn't win the tie until Arsenal had RVP sent off. My point is that we can't know what would have happened if the teams had remained even. You say that Barca would have beaten Arsenal handily anyway, and I've pointed to a number of factors that indicate that's not necessarily the case. We'll never know who is right, and that's the shame of that ridiculous call. You can try to compare it to the ref missing other decisions, but the fact is that the second yellow to RVP was universally derided and it was a completely unforced error from the ref. This wasn't a case of him not seeing something or being out of position or anything like that. He made a conscious decision to send him off for not hearing the whistle. It was a stunning decision, and one that is unprecidented if I'm not mistaken.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2011-03-12 20:40
It's not stunning, or ridiculous. It's completely fair.

FIFA's Laws of the Game state that a deliberate act of ignoring the referee's whistle is punishable by a yellow card. By kicking the ball out of play (and into Row Z, no less), AFTER the referee blew his whistle, RVP was rightly given a yellow card. The referee was simply following the bylaws of the game.

Stunning or not, it's in the rules.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2011-03-12 20:44
And it was only a yellow card. Had RVP not acted stupidly earlier, he would have only been on one yellow card, and not carrying one when he chose to ignore the referee.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # 2011-03-13 02:02
He didn't deliberately ignore the ref's whistle, he couldn't hear it because there were 95,000 fans in the stadium. For the ref to ignore that is ridiculous. Either way, I'm quite certain that during the fracas where three different Barcelona players were grabbing Arsenal players by the face and throat, the ref was blowing the whistle there too. Why no yellow cards for ignoring the whistle there.

He also didn't kick the ball into row Z either. He kicked a low shot that went a few feet wide right along the ground. The ball boys could have thrown Valdez a new ball and restarted play in seconds. No time was wasted. It's all such a load of crap. We got jobbed. Everybody admits it. You wouldn't even be arguing if you weren't a Spurs supporter.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-13 00:16
Quoting Grant:
We were ahead on goals when the ref blew the game. So regardless of how many goals Barca could have, might have, or probably should have scored prior to that point, the fact remains that they didn't win the tie until Arsenal had RVP sent off. My point is that we can't know what would have happened if the teams had remained even. You say that Barca would have beaten Arsenal handily anyway, and I've pointed to a number of factors that indicate that's not necessarily the case. We'll never know who is right, and that's the shame of that ridiculous call. You can try to compare it to the ref missing other decisions, but the fact is that the second yellow to RVP was universally derided and it was a completely unforced error from the ref. This wasn't a case of him not seeing something or being out of position or anything like that. He made a conscious decision to send him off for not hearing the whistle. It was a stunning decision, and one that is unprecidented if I'm not mistaken.


For god's sake, get over it. How do you excuse your results against Birmingham and Manchester United? Were you screwed by officials there or was is just defensive failings? Get the tinted glasses off and realise FCB beat you, games last 90 minutes, no less than that.

The fact is your supposed star player thought he was playing for FCB for a second and played in a wonderful backheel for the first goal.

RVP's reaction to kicking the ball away was not that of an innocent man. Did he look like a man who had blown his side's only clear chance through on Valdes, he had time so why not use his stronger left foot, and he also had a grin on his mouth after the shot, which tells me that he knew he was just taking a pop at goal regardless of the whistle going.

The above post is correct, the ref cannot be blamed for following the rules, simply because it doesnt happen in your domestic league doesnt mean it cannot happen in the CL, I would say refs are tighter on the rules there as it refelcts on them getting future games in the competition.

If your manager stopped being tight on the spending and bought an efficient centre half and goalkeeper then you may fare better. For the moment FCB are ahead of you, they dominated you and would have won if RVP had been on the park regardless.

Like 'a realist' I too neither support FCB or Arsenal, I am a Napoli fan, however FCB were far better than you.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+13 # 2011-03-08 21:51
The quality of Under Armour will be great for the players, I'm just kind of iffy on their templates so far. They have time to improve though.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # 2011-03-08 21:56
Was hoping Spurs would go with Nike next. Oh well.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-09 07:04
yeah i was hoping nike as well! we might as well hope for 2016
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2011-03-08 22:03
er some of the kits have been awful ....this is bad news
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2011-03-08 22:09
Please be an amazing kit please be an amazing kit please be an amazing kit...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-13 # 2011-03-08 22:42
Under Armor later added, "We figured we have no idea how to design a kit or jersey so why not pick a sh*t team to test it out on?"
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-09 07:05
hence why hannover was the first!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-08 22:52
The football side of Under Armour will go the same way as Canterbury. A very bad move for Tottenham.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # Feyeno0rd 2011-03-08 22:53
I have no idea what the designs will be like.
What I do know is that the kits will most likely be very comfortable.
UA is pretty clever when it comes to the fabric.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # 2011-03-08 23:46
I hope the template of the kit is nice, i like under armor but some templates are not that good looking.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-09 00:00
I'm really excited for this. I love all of Under Armour's stuff, and can't wait to see what they'll come up with for their first EPL kits.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # 2011-03-09 00:18
wow i actually didn't see this coming but i as an avid UA wearer am pleased to see under armour breaking their way into the epl
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 02:07
this is literally hell for spurs supporters in london.

levy, the spurs chairman, wont have to wear the crap that they are going to design for FIVE years so he isnt gonna care. but they are gonna sell a lot less.

i cant tell you how painful this is going to be, its like hearing christian gross is coming back as manager.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # 2011-03-09 02:56
What happened to the adidas deal?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2011-03-09 16:45
There never was one. That was just a rumor.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+12 # 2011-03-09 07:22
I think Spurs did something only spurs can do in a league of copycats. they went outside the norm and found a brand who can provide something different and something performance. I dont want my lads wearing the same kit as every other team in the league. Lets be different and be great
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-09 09:30
UA did a terrible job with Bundesliga team "Hannover 96" in terms of product availability ... home and away jersey were not available for a pretty long period and UA wasnt able to provide another big shippment of jersey over the time of the season. hideous!

I am sure they'll have to step up their game as the Tottenham supplier... we'll see!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # FortyFour 2011-03-09 09:47
Look at the J-League Round Up (Part 2) FSC posted a few days ago. Omiya Ardija's kit is made by Under Armor and it's awful.

http://www.footballshirtculture.com/11/12-kits/j-league-1-2011-round-up-part-2.html
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 10:33
may be its good for UA from marketing aspect
but for tottenham its not a good move,

adidas/nike/puma/umbro are leaders in football kits design and material/.
also in marketing, you will find adidas and nike stores every where!!
for example, i can easily find tottenham/newcastle/chelsea/man u/man city kits in my region/country because their are dealing with these big brand,
but UA ..!!
really i dont know!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2011-03-09 11:02
Under Armour are the company who've manufactured the last few godawful Wales rugby shirts. Not impressed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 13:12
Well I am very insure about UA as a supplier. From an economical point of view as a football club you need to be with adidas or Nike to get a world wide distribution and by that getting in the real money on merchandising. Anyone not signed with the big two are going to have a problem with reaching out beoynd their community.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-09 15:50
Just look at the Hannover shirts.
Shows what a crap move this is.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Aserbaijan23 2011-03-09 16:13
Quoting Gareth:
What happened to the adidas deal?


I was thinking the same.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 16:39
Take a look at the Hannover 96 and Aris kits they are disgusting! Under Armour is a huge downgrade from Puma!! Believe me.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2011-03-09 17:18
I have to say I'm positive excited to see the kits. Under Armour material quality is very good and I also like the job they're doing with H96.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 17:51
the adidas kits for spurs back in the days were sweet. will be interesting to see what under armour has in store for spurs.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-09 19:12
Get in there, should be such a nice kit
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # ChelseaBlueBoy 2011-03-09 19:33
Well here's a promise.
A great kit and a unique one, not the same old censoreding PUMA shit.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2011-03-09 20:16
this just shows the spurs arnt a brand. they change kit suppliers because the big boys dont mind losing them unlike the big clubs who seem to hold to a supplier
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2011-03-09 20:51
All the best with that, the Wales rugby kit is made by under armour and the Hanover 96 kit and the quality is awful. Nothing is cotton (not even training kit, polot shirts or sweatshirts)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # 2011-03-09 23:35
Cotton is not a performance material. Know what you are talking about.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 21:33
Not sure how I feel about this... I'm not usually big on Puma, but this year's Tottenham kit was one of my favourites of the season.
I guess we'll just wait and see how they do.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-09 22:41
Would have prefered umbro, kappa or even le coq (for retro sake)

But this is a big suprise and i dont know if its a good one or not. As long as the designs are clean and simple then i'm fine with it.

just glad its not boring adidas
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-10 04:08
I'm American and I'm not for this. But the Premier League has been being bought out by foreigners since the 90s, so if this turns out to be a good thing, then okay.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-18 03:58
Quoting Pooter McGee:
I'm American and I'm not for this. But the Premier League has been being bought out by foreigners since the 90s, so if this turns out to be a good thing, then okay.

They aren't buying the team they are just making the uniform...COYS
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-11 23:03
2 teams in mexico use under armour, estudiantes t. and toluca fc
here is a pic of toluca's UA shirt.
http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en/sports/soccer/mens/apparel/pid1217953-UA-Mexico-Soccer-Dominate-Jersey/1217953-600#
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-15 15:42
I'm a Hannover-based Hannover 96 fan, and you should see the kit, which is also from Under Armor. Absolutely lovely.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2011-03-19 23:10
I read something from espn where they stated that ua will have some sort of computer chip or sensor in these jerseys that can tell the fatigue level of the player. Sounds pretty cool, even though it won't be needed for Gareth Bale because he could run all day long.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-21 14:43
The University of Maryland teams wear Under Armour... it might give you a sense of what a Tottenham jersey could be like.

http://www.replayphotos.com/marylandphotostore/soccer-m-pictures/_MSOC___0001048.cfm
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-03-22 05:07
Americans don't come onto SOCCER sites to rip the Queen. Americans don't really bother you about SOCCER. Even though one should point out that the United States has never lost to England in the World Cup. Ever. But when you start ripping how the Americans make football kits, you seriously need your head examined.

Seriously? Nike can become quite lazy at times when it wants to push a 'Team' product, but their kit-making over the past three years has improved drastically. 10-11 Manchester United home kit looked terrible at first, but now fans will miss it. 2010 United States away kit, one that Robert Green has nightmares about. Have you seen Holland's kits in the past?

Nike reinvented the way football kits are viewed. In fact, mate, didn't Nike just buy Umbro? So, technically, Americans are making the England kit, too. Right?

I love Umbro like the next guy and love the Southampton home and new Sweden away.

Don't rip Americans for making crap kits. Because it's just plain untrue.

Under Armour will become the number 2 soccer kit supplier behind Nike by the year 2020. Bet any about of quid on that, mate.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2011-03-25 22:42
UA will have the chips in the shirts. It is similiar to those that the NFL used for the Combine. The chip measure a few different things. Probably the most important things that it will measure for soccer will be respritory and heart rate. You can then use the data to change training sessions to taylor fit individual player needs.

http://www.soccerbible.com/news/general/archive/2011/03/25/high-tech-ua-shirts-coming-to-the-premier-league.aspx
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2011-05-11 10:34
Under Armour? why this is an American based American football design why its English football within an English league.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # 2011-07-13 18:57
oh well thumbs down for me under armour just about on par with umbro yes nike owns umbro but they both have their own identities as kits and i find nikes have a little more class than umbro kits which on the whole i find a touch tacky but they have released the odd nice shirt once in a while
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2012-04-16 05:34
wow that is seems to be something amazing and these types of facts relaxes my mind thanks for sharing....for best apparels you have the best online fashion era by the name of got apparel..



http://www.gotapparel.com
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh