Football Shirt Culture

Comments (26)

  1. Oldest First
  2. Newest First
  1. fsc

Canterbury is coming with great football kits now

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7032
  1. fsc

Canterbury\'s bubble has burst already.... think Pony when they did West Ham and Spurs...

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7033
  1. fsc

Bloody nasty, whats with those stripes on the front

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7034
  1. fsc

it\'s part of the sponsors logo you muppet.<br /><br />and i thought everyone one on there knew a bit about football kits.<br /><br />I think these kits are superb.....

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7035
  1. fsc

looks like league 2 kit

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7036
  1. fsc

....ahahaha..... you could say that about every kit then....<br />...gee, Chelsea\'s kit looks like a league 2 kit....<br />.....oh look,....Liverpools kit looks like a league 2 kit...<br />see...

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7037
  1. danwho

B) <br /><br />These kits get the 5/5 for many reasons (and no, I\'m not a Lille fan before accusations of bias are thrown my way!)<br /><br />1. They are simple without being simplistic - the difference is with most League 2 kits;<br /><br />2. Although Canterbury have their logo on front, the club badge is still the most prominent;<br /><br />3. The sponsor\'s logo is distinctive yet blends with the shirt and doesn\'t stand out due to ugly/clashing colours. This is probably the best effort in getting a sponsor\'s name distinctive without ruining the rest of the shirt;<br /><br />4. Good colours - OK clubs have a bit of history (although changes happened years ago) but Canterbury have picked good tones or shades. Simple away yet still does the job of an away shirt (ie doesn\'t look like the home one! Think Nike Think!) and the ubiquitous third (can\'t see a need for it other than financial);<br /><br />5. The symmetry of this kit proves why most of us hate asymmetrical kits. The...

B) <br /><br />These kits get the 5/5 for many reasons (and no, I\'m not a Lille fan before accusations of bias are thrown my way!)<br /><br />1. They are simple without being simplistic - the difference is with most League 2 kits;<br /><br />2. Although Canterbury have their logo on front, the club badge is still the most prominent;<br /><br />3. The sponsor\'s logo is distinctive yet blends with the shirt and doesn\'t stand out due to ugly/clashing colours. This is probably the best effort in getting a sponsor\'s name distinctive without ruining the rest of the shirt;<br /><br />4. Good colours - OK clubs have a bit of history (although changes happened years ago) but Canterbury have picked good tones or shades. Simple away yet still does the job of an away shirt (ie doesn\'t look like the home one! Think Nike Think!) and the ubiquitous third (can\'t see a need for it other than financial);<br /><br />5. The symmetry of this kit proves why most of us hate asymmetrical kits. The lines are clean and it\'s pleasing to the eye!<br /><br />Well enough from me..... ;-)

Read More
 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7038
  1. fsc

:lol: <br />Could not have said it in less words my self.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7039
  1. fsc

copy something from adidas,<br />copy something from nike

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7040
  1. fsc

This kit is so close to perfection. (3/5) However, the sponsor logo is far too large for this shirt. It nearly overpowers the shirt, but I do think it is better than most French shirts sponsor-logo wise.<br /><br />Also, the navy should extend further up the shoulders. The boundary between the red and blue should follow the line of the torso, not the natural shoulder joint. It creates a more aesthetically pleasing line.<br /><br />Canterbury make a great shirt, but I think they will need a few years to perfect their products. I can\'t wait until then!

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7041
  1. fsc

Total rip offs of the Nike Brazil template from the \'06 World Cup!!!!<br /><br />Canterbury have lost it!

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7042
  1. fsc

simple doesn\'t mean poor.<br /><br />I like these kits, they\'re classy and well-designed, especially for a french team.<br />LOSC are lucky to have Canterbury to be honest.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7043
  1. fsc

They look like they should be in the Tour de France in those shirts, not playing football

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7044
  1. James Duffill

Seriously some of you havent got a clue. All three shirts are shit. They look like Diadora shirts from four years ago.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7045
  1. fsc

Canterbury hands down make the best football shirts of any brand, they\'re really coming into their own. Their designs are as distinctive as those of nike and adidas but the rugby influenced styling creates an extra touch of class and make them really wearable for the average fan without looking chavy

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7047
  1. fsc

crap, looks like a hybrid of nike and adidas. The arm inserts are the same as nikes\' team wear from 2006 and the neck is just the same as brazil 2006 and similar to Chelsea 06 but cheaper looking. Nothing original there, open your eyes....

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7048
  1. fsc

I wouldn\'t wipe my arse with any of them.<br />I agree with Bertracoon, in fact I agree with anyone with a sweet name like that.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7049
  1. fsc

White ones look great. Canterbury make great kits, also very comfortable!

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7050
  1. fsc

nice kits...as a LOSC fan myself, I think they are marvelous kits. I\'m going to buy the away kit because it is very classy.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7051
  1. fsc

i remember when giggsy looped that one in at lille in the champions leauge round of 16. i can still see the keeper yelling at the refferee....classic

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7052
  1. fsc

excellent colour choice\'s <br />I can see alot of money was put into changing the design of each strip :-x

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7053
  1. fsc

I like the kits, good shades of colors, great collars.<br /><br />I hate the team crest but I gotta give it to Lille for being one of the few Frog teams with one sponsor.<br /><br />Ribbit.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7054
  1. fsc

the P at the bottom of the shirt is way too big it ruins the kit.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7055
  1. fsc

Not bad at all! Distinctive and classy.

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7056
  1. fsc

Rip off ............. the neck and the end of the sleeve are an exact copy of the World Cup 2006 Brasil shirt

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7057
  1. fsc

i fink dere all nice, i just bought the away top. really comfy, and a different style. and im from english!!

 
  1. Reply
  2. Report
  3. #7058
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below
https://www.footballshirtculture.com/index.php?option=com_komento&controller=captcha&task=generate&id=37722596&tmpl=component

Classic Football Shirts